#408 Pattern Recognition - Do you recognize it?

Until City Council reorganizes its time around rigorous oversight, core service resilience, and structural governance reform, Ottawa will remain locked in a cycle where the next emergency dictates the city's future.

Twenty Days in February: What Ottawa's Institutions Did

A case study in institutional Actions and Inactions, and why Ward 13 residents should care four years later

I keep coming back to a simple discipline in this campaign: before arguing about what a councillor should do next, look closely at what institutions actually did last time the pressure was real. Ottawa's five governing bodies — police, the police oversight board, city administration, the mayor's office, and council — were all tested at once during the "Freedom Convoy" occupation of January–February 2022. It's the clearest recent case study we have of how this city's institutions behave under sustained crisis, and the record is public: sworn testimony at the federal Public Order Emergency Commission, council transcripts, and contemporaneous reporting all exist. History doesn't repeat, but institutional habits do — and the habits on display in February 2022 are worth understanding before we hand anyone another term.

This isn't a piece about the protest itself, its politics, or who was right about the underlying public health mandates. It's about governance: who had authority, who used it, who deflected it, and what happened to each of them afterward.

Who Did What

Five institutions, one 20-day crisis (Jan. 28 – Feb. 19, 2022)

Actor	Position at the time	Key actions / decisions	Accountability outcome
Ottawa Police Service	Peter Sloly, Chief	Publicly predicted the protest would clear out after the first weekend; when it didn't, shifted to a "surge and contain" posture and asked for roughly 1,800 additional officers to end it.	Resigned Feb. 15, on day 19 of the occupation, in what the board chair called a mutually agreeable separation.
Ottawa Police Services Board	Diane Deans, Chair	Declared the city "under siege" and demanded a concrete end-plan; after Sloly's resignation, moved to hire a replacement chief without briefing council or the mayor's office first.	Removed as chair by council the next night; the chief she'd hired withdrew within 48 hours after councillors objected to being kept in the dark.
City Administration	Steve Kanellakos, City Manager	Told the federal inquiry the city deferred to police on strategy throughout; personally helped broker a deal moving heavy trucks off residential streets and onto Wellington; spent weeks struggling to find tow operators willing to remove vehicles.	No formal review of his role tied to the convoy specifically. He left the position in November 2022, in a separate matter, citing his own decision.
Mayor	Jim Watson	Voiced confidence in Chief Sloly as late as the Monday before he resigned; negotiated the truck-relocation deal through an intermediary rather than meeting organizers directly; reportedly pushed to replace Deans as board chair before council's vote.	No resignation, no removal — the mayor's office has no equivalent recall mechanism to the police board. Absorbed public criticism but served out the remainder of the term.
City Council (collective)	23 members	Voted 15–9 to remove Deans as board chair one day after the chief resigned, in a session one councillor called political theatre; installed two replacement councillors on the board that same night.	Restructured the board only after the crisis had already peaked and a botched hire had already happened — reactive oversight, not preventive.
Rawlson King	Ward 13 Councillor, also sitting on the Police Services Board	Defended the board's record during the crisis, saying it had asked the toughest questions of anyone; resigned his board seat in protest the same night Deans was removed, citing a disagreement with the mayor's vision for police governance.	Left the board in February 2022 and, to date, has not returned to a police-oversight seat — a gap that matters given his newsletter's continued framing around public safety.

Three Lessons, Not Just One Story

1Oversight showed up after the crisis, not during it

Council didn't restructure the police board while the occupation was actively failing to disperse — it restructured the board the day after the chief had already quit, in response to a hiring process gone wrong. The pattern is a reactive one: institutional correction arrived once the visible failure was undeniable, not while there was still time to prevent it. That's a useful yardstick for evaluating any oversight body, then or now: does it act on early warning signs, or only after the headline forces its hand?

2Ownership got passed down the chain, not up it

The city manager told the federal inquiry the administration deferred to police on strategy. The police chief said he was under significant pressure from all three levels of government. The mayor negotiated through an intermediary rather than directly. Each layer of the response had a plausible account for why the decision wasn't really theirs to make alone. That diffusion of ownership is worth naming, because it's a structural pattern, not a personality flaw — and it shows up again whenever this city faces a slow-moving failure with no single accountable owner.

3The record on public statements versus institutional actions doesn't always match

Councillor King's public defence of the board's competence — that it had asked the toughest questions of the crisis — came the same week the board he sat on was being dismantled for a hiring process that bypassed council entirely. Both things can be true at once: a defence of an institution's diligence, and a documented process failure inside that same institution. The point isn't to relitigate February 2022. It's that his own account of the board's competence is now on the public record, from his own words, and it's fair to weigh it against everything that followed — including a Police Services Board that, per the Auditor General's more recent findings, has continued to report inaccurately on its own oversight functions.

Why this matters for October 2026: Ottawa's institutions were tested once, hard, and the pattern that emerged — reactive rather than preventive oversight, diffused ownership, and a gap between public defence and institutional performance — isn't unique to the convoy. It's the same shape as the O-Train oversight gaps, the St-Laurent tunnel silence, and the OPS Board's "not robust" database-auditing admission I've written about elsewhere. History here isn't a closed file. It's a pattern still running.

References

1. CBC News, "The convoy crisis in Ottawa: A timeline of key events" — cbc.ca
2. CTV News Ottawa, "Trucker convoy: Ottawa police chief Peter Sloly resigns" — ottawa.ctvnews.ca
3. Global News, "Ottawa police Chief Peter Sloly resigns amid 'freedom convoy' blockade" — globalnews.ca
4. Global News, "Ottawa city council ousts Diane Deans as police board chair" — globalnews.ca
5. CBC News, "Diane Deans ousted from oversight board in overhaul of Ottawa's police leadership" — cbc.ca
6. CBC News, "Police chief terminates contract after 2 days" — cbc.ca
7. CTV News Ottawa, "Ottawa police board chair ousted in dramatic city council meeting" — ottawa.ctvnews.ca
8. The Globe and Mail, "High-level departures have hobbled Ottawa police service, board" — theglobeandmail.com
9. CTV News, "Ontario replacing three Ottawa police board members after one attended 'Freedom Convoy' protest" — ctvnews.ca
10. CP24, "City of Ottawa followed police lead on 'Freedom Convoy' response: city manager" — cp24.com
11. CBC News, "City manager hits back at idea meeting with feds would have sent convoy members home" — cbc.ca
12. CBC News, "How a plan to end the convoy protest came together — and why it failed" — cbc.ca
13. Global News, "Emergencies Act inquiry: Security officials raised 'concern' about convoy trucks near Hill" — globalnews.ca
14. CBC News, "City manager Steve Kanellakos steps down, effective immediately" — cbc.ca
15. CBC News, "Sloly felt 'significant pressure' to resign, inquiry hears" — cbc.ca
16. CBC News, "Former Ottawa police chief thought protest would end after 1st weekend, inquiry hears" — cbc.ca

i

One more time...what would you do differently?

 

This time around, inform yourselves, vote differently, vote wisely. Vote for Peter Karwacki for Rideau Rockcliffe.

Firefighters, Not Oversight: Why Ottawa City Council Is Trapped in Crisis Management

Published in Municipal Governance & Infrastructure

Ottawa City Councillors have a finite amount of time, energy, and political capital. Yet when you look at the recent history of our city, that bandwidth is continuously consumed by emergencies: the Ottawa Police Service breakdowns during the trucker convoy, systemic LRT failures, recurring localized flooding, and chronic transit budget deficits.

A pattern this consistent isn't just bad luck—it points to a structural failure in how municipal governance prioritizes its time and authority. When a city bounces perpetually from one emergency to the next, what does it say about where Council's focus currently lies, and where it urgently needs to shift?

What the Pattern of Crises Reveals

When you step back from the individual headlines, the repeated crises expose three systemic vulnerabilities at City Hall:

• Information Asymmetry & Weak Statutory Oversight: As Justice William Hourigan highlighted during the LRT Public Inquiry, crucial operational details were withheld from Council, crippling its ability to exercise meaningful legal oversight. When Council functions primarily as a rubber stamp for staff-driven megaprojects or arm's-length boards, it surrenders control over risk management long before a breakdown occurs.
• The "Ward vs. City" Time Trap: Councillors spend a massive proportion of their working hours navigating hyper-local constituent issues—potholes, traffic calming, and minor zoning tweaks. While critical to residents, this operational quicksand leaves very little room to interrogate complex, multi-billion-dollar infrastructure contracts or audit long-term municipal risk.
• Deferred Maintenance and Outdated Resilience Standards: Infrastructure planned around historic climate averages and optimistic usage projections is failing under the weight of extreme weather events and rapid growth. Crises happen when legacy systems hit their breaking point without adequate preventative auditing.

"If Council operates primarily as operational firefighters, the next crisis will always dictate their agenda."

Where the Focus of Council Must Shift

To break this reactive cycle, City Council must deliberately realign its agenda around three non-negotiable governance priorities:

1. Rigorous Audit & Contractual Oversight

Instead of relying on polished, high-level summaries from staff and external consultants, Council must institute aggressive, independent oversight. This means demanding transparent, unvarnished performance metrics on all major operations and mandating independent third-party technical reviews before approving critical project phases.

2. Core Service Resilience Over Shiny Megaprojects

The baseline obligation of municipal government is ensuring basic systems work reliably. Council needs to prioritize state-of-good-repair funding for stormwater infrastructure, road safety, and transit reliability before committing to speculative expansions. Climate-resilience standards must be embedded directly into asset management to stop predictable environmental shocks from becoming operational emergencies.

3. Modernizing Crisis Response & Governance Models

Council cannot manage modern, multi-faceted issues using outdated administrative structures. Diverting non-policing emergency calls to specialized civilian response units allows the Police Services Board and OPS to concentrate strictly on core safety obligations. Concurrently, delegating routine administrative tasks to staff or community council mechanisms would free up crucial agenda space for strategic risk management.

The Bottom Line

Moving from crisis to crisis isn't inevitable—it is the result of a system structured to react rather than govern. Until City Council reorganizes its time around rigorous oversight, core service resilience, and structural governance reform, Ottawa will remain locked in a cycle where the next emergency dictates the city's future.