Campaign Video

Https://youtu.be/zBxbnuPAazE

Wednesday, 21 October 2026

#577 I'm voting for you!

 


Today was unique in my campaign.  People were saying "I already voted for you"

This prompted me to ask them, why?

The responses

1. You showed up at my door
2. Seven years in office is too long
3. King does not answer my calls
4. Its time for a change
5. We only see him at election time

You get the idea. This was not one or two. The responses were consistent.

As a result it was encouraging to say the least.

One woman asked about Falan Gong

I responded that freedom of spiritual belief is important...but a councillor must focus on oversight of thecity budget and policies.


Its nice, but the NAC needs to pursue this matter, not the city councillor.





Who Answers for the NAC?

A city councillor taking an interest in the Shen Yun decision is a nice gesture. But the National Arts Centre is the one that needs to pursue this, and to answer for it.

The NAC has stopped hosting Shen Yun after nearly two decades of performances. Whatever you think of the show, the question of how and why that decision was made is a fair one. It is also a question for the institution that made the decision, not for City Hall.

What is on the public record

The Falun Dafa Association of Ottawa, which helps organize the local Shen Yun performances, has filed for a judicial review in Federal Court. It alleges the NAC acted improperly in denying the show space in 2026 and beyond, and that the NAC failed to engage properly on its show dates (CTV News).

The filing also points to contacts between NAC officials and the Chinese consulate over several years, including a private dinner at the ambassador’s residence in October 2024 (Global News). It further says a senior NAC official stated at a 2025 public meeting that the NAC would not comply with a request from a Chinese official to bar Shen Yun (CTV News).

The NAC’s own account is different. CBC reported that internal deliberations weighed allegations about Shen Yun’s treatment of audience members with disabilities, along with a breach of earlier contract terms, and that the CEO described a possible decision as a programming matter (CBC / Radio-Canada). Shen Yun and Falun Gong deny those allegations. The NAC says it will not comment while the matter is before the courts.

These are allegations and counter-allegations. Nothing here has been tested in court. That is exactly why the people with the power to get answers matter.

Who actually has jurisdiction

The NAC is a federal Crown corporation. That decides where the questions go.

BodyRole in this matter
NAC board and leadershipDecided it. Can explain the reasoning, the process, and who it met with beforehand.
Federal CourtReviewing it. Can order the NAC to produce the record of the decision.
Minister of Canadian Heritage and ParliamentOversight. Can ask the board for answers, and a committee can call witnesses.
Ottawa City CouncilNo authority. Does not fund or govern NAC programming, and cannot compel documents or testimony.

A councillor can say something supportive, and that has value as a signal. But a statement is not an investigation. It cannot get a single page of the decision record released.

Outputs versus outcomes

A statement from a councillor is an output. An outcome is the public finally knowing who decided, on what grounds, and what contact the NAC had with foreign officials beforehand.

There are two possible explanations, and right now the public cannot tell them apart. Either this was an ordinary programming and contract decision, or foreign pressure played some part. Both claims are serious, and both deserve a documented answer rather than a no-comment line.

What the NAC should do. Once the court process allows, explain the decision in plain terms. Disclose its meetings with foreign officials. And tell the public what its policy is when a foreign government asks it to cancel a show.

A taxpayer-funded national institution should not leave Canadians wondering whether a foreign government shaped its bookings. If you want answers, aim at the place that can give them: the NAC board and the federal officials who oversee it.

#576 Voters? When will the shit hit the fan?

The Robert O. Pickard Environmental Centre used to take waste from recreational vehicles. It doesn’t anymore. As far as I can tell, nobody told the people who relied on it.

What I know

I was at the gate of the Pickard Centre. A security guard told me, point blank, that it no longer accepts waste from RVs.

That’s firsthand, but a guard at a gate isn’t a City notice. So I looked for something on the record. The best I found is a single Campendium review, posted June 23, 2026, saying the dump station stopped operating as of November 30, 2025.[1] If that’s right, the service has been gone for most of a year.

Meanwhile, the same Campendium listing still shows weekday hours, and another directory still lists Pickard as a free dump station.[1][3] The City’s own description of the service, as copied onto a campground host page, promised free RV disposal on weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m., with City staff escorting you to the discharge point and no flushing water supplied.[2] I could not find a current City notice announcing that this ended.

What the record shows

QuestionSourceStatus
Pickard no longer takes RV wasteGuard at the gate (my visit)Firsthand, not official
It ended Nov. 30, 2025One Campendium review, June 2026 [1]Single user report
Directories still show it as open and freeCampendium, RVing Life [1][3]Confirmed (out of date)
The City announced the change—Not found
Why it ended—Not found
Temporary or permanent—Not found
A replacement or recommended alternative—Not found

“Not found” means I found nothing in my searches. It does not mean no such record exists.

So where do RV owners go?

The nearby options in the directories are mostly campgrounds, and the distances add up. Late October makes it worse: one directory notes that nearly every seasonal station shuts off its water from mid-October to mid-May.[3]

Distance to listed RV dump stations near Ottawa (km) Distance to listed RV dump stations near Ottawa (km) 0 10 20 30 40 km Rideau Heights Campgrounds · free 7.7 Pickard Centre · CLOSED 10.3 Camping Cantley (QC) · varies 17.9 Camping Ange-Gardien (QC) · free 22.2 Camping Parc de la Gatineau (QC) · varies 32.7 Paradis Camping · free 37.2 Embrun RV Discharge Station · free 38.6 Maple View Campground · varies 38.9

Distances are the directory’s figures from its Ottawa reference point, converted from miles to kilometres. They are not measured from any one address. Fee labels come from the same directory and may be out of date. Several of these are campgrounds that may limit dumping to guests or close for winter, so call ahead.[3]

Other places manage this

Gatineau runs a free RV dump at its own wastewater treatment plant. According to user check-ins, you call ahead, and a staff member comes out to confirm you’re an RV. One user reports that the call-ahead rule exists because commercial haulers had been dumping large volumes of raw sewage there.[4] That is one user’s account, not an official statement. A Gatineau wastewater bylaw on file with Quebec’s environmental review office also deals with the discharge of RV waste into the city’s treatment works, so the city regulates it.[5]

Closer to home, the small municipality of Mississippi Mills runs a free RV disposal station in Almonte. It’s self-serve, and users fill out a short online form each time.[6] It’s seasonal, May 15 to October 15, which is why it’s no help to anyone this week.

The point isn’t that these are perfect. They show that a municipality can keep this service going and manage the abuse risk without ending it.

What a fix could look like

A basic RV dump is a drain, a concrete pad and a rinse hose. Ottawa’s old arrangement didn’t even supply flushing water.[2] If the concern is security or staff time at a major treatment plant, one obvious question is whether a station could sit outside the gatehouse, or at a lower-risk City site such as a public works yard. I don’t know the site constraints: sanitary connection, spill containment, room for rigs to queue off Green Creek Drive. The City does, and it should be able to say whether it looked at this.

Questions the City should answer

  1. When did Pickard stop accepting RV waste, and where was that announced?
  2. Why did it end? Was it cost, staffing, security, abuse by commercial haulers, or a regulatory or operational constraint?
  3. Is the closure temporary or permanent?
  4. Was a station outside the gatehouse, or at another City site, considered? What would it cost?
  5. What does the City recommend for RV owners in the meantime?

Anyone can send these to 311. If the answers are slow or vague, an access-to-information request under MFIPPA can pull the briefing notes and emails behind the decision.

Why this matters

The Pickard Centre treats the wastewater of more than 90% of Ottawa’s population, over 900,000 people.[7] That’s the output. This is the outcome for the people who used the RV service: a free service that vanished, a gate that turns them away, and directories that still send them there.

There may be a good reason for the closure. But ending a small, free service with no visible notice and no stated alternative is a process failure on its own, whatever the reason turns out to be.

References

  1. Campendium, “Robert O. Pickard Environmental Centre RV Dump” (listing and user reviews; review dated June 23, 2026). maps.campendium.com/ca/on/places/robert-o-pickard-environmental-centre-rv-dump-on
  2. Harvest Hosts, Ottawa host page quoting the City of Ottawa’s description of RV waste acceptance at ROPEC (free, weekdays 8:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m., staff escort, no flushing water). Third-party copy; I could not locate the current City page. harvesthosts.com/hosts/ontario/2CEECN0FdZUhEp4wY9HG
  3. RVing Life, “RV Dump & Sani-Dump Stations In Ottawa, Ontario” (source of the distances, fee labels and the winter-shutoff note). rvinglife.com/ontario-ottawa-rv-dumpsite
  4. iOverlander, “Station d’epuration de Gatineau | Sanitation Dump Station” (user check-ins). ioverlander.com/places/99141-station-d-epuration-de-gatineau
  5. Ville de Gatineau, wastewater and sludge discharge bylaw excerpt (BAPE archives). archives.bape.gouv.qc.ca … DA7.pdf
  6. Municipality of Mississippi Mills, “RV Disposal Station.” mississippimills.ca/municipal-services/water-and-sewage/rv-disposal-station
  7. Wikipedia, “Robert O. Pickard Environmental Centre” (800 Green Creek Drive; serves over 90% of Ottawa’s population). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_O._Pickard_Environmental_Centre

Tuesday, 20 October 2026

#575 Data-driven leadership versus "Leadership that listens" for Rideau-Rockcliffe.

 A trained and experienced senior administrator, data analyst and project manager


Or


A pandering communicator who must continually read his notes.


Hmm


What a tough choice!








Sunday, 18 October 2026

#574 After Seven Long Years...


Go ahead and watch the Roger's Debate video, a small ask (30 minutes) of your civic responsibility.

Every four years you get to hold your councillor to account for their action or inaction.

In RideauRockcliffe 60% who can, simply will not vote, and of the 40% who do, barely 10% will have bothered to watch the ward debate between myself and the King.

Here is the link. A 30 minute ask for your civic responsibility!








 





#573 Rockcliffe Airstrip - Where's the beef? None for small planes.

Everyone’s Plan Ends at Rockcliffe. Nobody’s Includes Ward 13.

Everyone’s Planning Ends at Rockcliffe. Nobody’s Included Ward 13.

The Ottawa Flying Club needs a new home by 2028. One answer on the table is an airstrip in our ward.

The Ottawa Flying Club’s lease on the north field at Ottawa International Airport expires in 2028, and the Airport Authority plans to redevelop that land.1 The authority’s answer to the club’s future is that Rockcliffe Airport would welcome the club, and it has offered support to facilitate a move.1

That airstrip is in Ward 13.

What Rockcliffe is

Rockcliffe was recognized in 2018 as Canada’s oldest active airport. The Rockcliffe Flying Club uses and maintains it beside the Canada Aviation and Space Museum.2 It has one paved runway of about 3,300 feet and no control tower.3

Who owns it depends on which source you read. One says the museum owns the field.2 Another says the flying club leases it from the National Capital Commission.4 If the public record can’t agree on who owns it, who should residents be talking to.

Why a move isn’t a fix

The club’s case is that its students train at an international airport and learn modern navigation systems that smaller airports don’t offer.1 Rockcliffe has no tower, so moving the club changes where it trains, not what it trains in. That isn’t a criticism of Rockcliffe. It means the question to answer is what training the club keeps and what it gives up.

Runway length may matter less than people assume. The north field’s runway is also reported at about 3,300 feet.5

The neighbours

Housing is being built on the former base lands, which Canada Lands Company owns.6 That is Wateridge Village, a few steps from the airstrip. More students and more flights raise noise and traffic questions. Residents should hear about them before a deal is signed, not after.

Everyone’s Plan Ends at Rockcliffe. Nobody’s Includes Ward 13.

The Gatineau question

Ottawa-Gatineau is one capital region, and a river shouldn’t decide where pilots train. Gatineau-Ottawa Executive Airport has a 6,000-foot runway7 and already hosts flight schools.8 It is a serious option.

The decision is being made between an airport authority, a flying club and federal landholders, and the city’s role is unclear. Ward 13 absorbs the impact if the answer is Rockcliffe, and the region loses a century-old club if the answer is nowhere.

Published figures only. Blank means I didn’t find a confirmed figure. FAA-derived listings for Canadian airports may be incomplete.
SiteRunwayControl towerTraining already there
Ottawa Intl, north field (today)about 3,300 ft5Airport is controlledOttawa Flying Club
Rockcliffeabout 3,300 ft3No3Rockcliffe Flying Club2
Gatineau-Ottawa Executive6,000 ft7No7Fixed-wing and helicopter schools8
Carp

Why Gatineau may be the better home

The club’s case rests on three things: instrument approaches, NAV CANADA air traffic services, and training in busy airspace. Here is how each one holds up, including where the evidence is thin.


A standard Boeing 737 cannot normally take off or land on a 3,500-foot runway under normal commercial operating conditions, as most variants require at least 5,000 to 7,000+ feet depending on weight and weather.

Instrument training

The club’s president says outlying airports lack the instrument landing systems and GPS approaches that Ottawa International has.1 That is the strongest argument against any move, and it applies to Rockcliffe and Gatineau alike. For Gatineau the record is mixed. FAA-derived listings show no published instrument procedures,7 and the airport’s director general once said management had asked NAV CANADA for a GPS approach with vertical guidance.9 Meanwhile, the schools based there list instrument-rated programs.10,11 Approaches are published by NAV CANADA, not by the club or the city, which is why the first ask below is a NAV CANADA commitment.

NAV CANADA and busy airspace

Gatineau’s listing shows an Ottawa Departures frequency,12 so aircraft leaving the field work with the same Ottawa terminal control that handles the airliners. That suggests the busy-airspace experience comes from the region’s controlled airspace as much as from one runway.

Bilingual training

The Canadian Aviation Regulations already require Ottawa International’s tower to provide air traffic services in English and French, and they list Gatineau’s flight service station for bilingual advisory and relay services.13 So bilingual service is not unique to Gatineau. The International Pilot Academy there is affiliated with Cégep Heritage College.10

The runway and the cluster

Gatineau’s runway is 6,000 feet, almost twice Rockcliffe’s.7 The airport markets itself as a training hub with three flight schools on site.14 That gives the club neighbours, shared services and room to grow.

Gatineau may well be the best home. But the case rests on things nobody has published: which approaches would be available, and what the club needs to keep its standard. That is why the asks below start with NAV CANADA.

What I’d ask for

  1. A NAV CANADA commitment. Whichever site is chosen, publish its instrument approaches and airspace arrangements before the lease ends.
  2. Disclosure. Publish the airport authority’s discussions with Rockcliffe: who pays, what space is offered, and the timeline.
  3. Consult first. Run a noise and traffic review with Wateridge, Manor Park and Rockcliffe residents before any commitment is made.
  4. A real comparison. Publish the options (a partial stay at the airport, Rockcliffe, Gatineau, Carp) against stated criteria, including training quality.

Judge the outcome by how many pilots the region trains, not by whether a relocation was announced. The lease ends in 2028, inside the next council’s term. Whoever sits on it will own this decision.

Sources

  1. CTV Ottawa: Ottawa Flying Club president says Canada sleepwalking into pilot shortage
  2. Wikipedia: Ottawa/Rockcliffe Airport
  3. AvnWx: CYRO (FAA-derived data)
  4. Jettly: Ottawa/Rockcliffe (YRO)
  5. SimFlight: CYOW review (simulator scenery review)
  6. Wikipedia: CFB Rockcliffe
  7. AvnWx: CYND (FAA-derived data)
  8. Wikipedia: Gatineau-Ottawa Executive Airport
  9. Skies Magazine: Gatineau-Ottawa Executive Airport profile (undated; check for updates)
  10. Airline & Flight Training Media: International Pilot Academy job posting
  11. Airline & Flight Training Media: Select Aviation College job posting
  12. Sprinkle: Ottawa/Gatineau Airport (CYND) listing
  13. Canadian Aviation Regulations, section 801.11 (2021 version; check current text)
  14. Gatineau-Ottawa Executive Airport: training centre
Flight training at Gatineau-Ottawa Executive Airport (CYND)

Flight training at Gatineau-Ottawa Executive Airport (CYND)

Checked October 18, 2026 against the sources named in each row.

OrganizationTypeOfferingsFleetConfirmation
Aéroclub Gatineau-Ottawa Flying club and flight school, at CYND since 2011
  • Recreational permit, private and commercial licences
  • Night, VOTT and seaplane ratings; flight instructor rating
  • Instrument rating and ultralight training (third-party listing)
  • “Pilote d’un jour” intro flight: 1 hr ground, 1 hr in the Cessna 150
  • Ground school online via Aero-Instruction.ca
Cessna 150 two-seater (one aircraft per a third-party listing) ConfirmedOwn website, page dated Jan 7, 2026. Tel. 819 598-0379. Intro flight pricing is by request.
International Pilot Academy Flight school, in Gatineau since 2015
  • Private, commercial and airline pilot training
  • Additional qualification courses
  • Partnered with Cégep Heritage College for accredited training
Not confirmed Partly confirmedAirport page and a May 2024 news article. I could not reach the academy’s own site, so check current programs with them.
Select Aviation College Aviation college, fixed-wing and helicopter
  • Integrated ATPL and commercial pilot programs
  • Bush pilot and IFR-type certifications
  • Helicopter training
  • Students from 35+ countries
40+ aircraft, including Cessna, Piper, Robinson R44 and Bell 505 ConfirmedAviation trade news, June 10, 2026: 16-student spring 2026 intake at CYND.
  • Only Aéroclub Gatineau-Ottawa operates as a flying club. The other two are schools.
  • Vintage Wings of Canada is a warbird organization based at CYND, not a flying club. I did not re-verify its current status.
  • Gatineau Gliding Club flies from Pendleton, Ontario, not from CYND.

Saturday, 17 October 2026

#572 How's your Crystal Ball?



Preparedness means practicing for the outliers and reducing vulnerabilities in advance, not just reacting after a once-in-a-generation storm. The July 1 event and others give concrete local examples to build on.


**The July 1, 2026 flooding (up to ~167 mm in a few hours in places like Britannia, city-labeled roughly a 1-in-200-year event in spots, thousands of basement floods, major insured losses concentrated in Nepean/southwest Ottawa as part of a broader Ontario-Quebec thunderstorm event later estimated around $491 million) is a clear real-world example of the “expect the unexpected” theme in my 2023 unpublished.ca piece.** It showed how intense short-duration rainfall can overwhelm drainage, cause widespread property damage, disrupt services, and leave people dealing with insurance gaps, cleanup, and long-term fallout (some apartment residents reported months of issues).


Drawing from recent years of news, official climate assessments (including Ottawa’s Climate Ready work and vulnerability studies), and events that have already hit the National Capital Region or nearby, here are other plausible high-impact scenarios that are possible even if not the most probable in any given year. These align with the piece’s call to imagine and prepare for outliers beyond routine asset-focused planning.


### Extreme convective storms, tornadoes, and derecho-style wind events

Ottawa has already seen these. The 2018 EF3 tornado path from Dunrobin into Gatineau caused major structural damage, power outages, and injuries. The May 2022 derecho brought estimated gusts up to ~190 km/h in parts of the city, widespread tree and infrastructure destruction, power outages affecting hundreds of thousands (Hydro Ottawa described some impacts as worse than the 1998 ice storm or 2018 tornadoes in scale), fatalities regionally, and roughly $1 billion in damages across Ontario and Quebec. Smaller tornadoes have occurred more recently (e.g., Barrhaven area in 2023; EF0 near Kemptville in August 2026). Climate projections and recent patterns support more favorable conditions for severe winds, tornadoes, and long-lived thunderstorm lines. A stronger or more urban-centered event, or a sequence of them, remains possible and could combine with flooding or power loss.


### Ice storms, freezing rain, and severe winter events

The 1998 ice storm remains a regional benchmark for prolonged outages and infrastructure damage. A late-March 2025 ice storm in Ontario and Quebec was one of the costliest events of that year for insurers (~$466 million). Projections note more days near 0°C and potential increases in freezing rain under climate change, with recent warnings (e.g., around El Niño influences) of more freeze-thaw cycles and ice accumulation. Extended outages in extreme cold (or followed by thaw/flooding) stress heating, water systems, and vulnerable populations. Record snowfalls have also disrupted the city in recent years.


### Prolonged or intense heat waves

Ottawa has experienced multi-day heat events with high humidex values (near or at records around 46–47). 2025 already featured multiple heat warnings and a high number of days over 30°C. Official projections point to roughly four times as many very hot days by the 2050s under higher-emission scenarios, plus more humidity. Impacts include health system strain (emergency visits, hospitalizations), power demand spikes that risk outages, and amplified effects on seniors, outdoor workers, and those without adequate cooling. Compounding with wildfire smoke or infrastructure issues raises the stakes.


### Major riverine flooding or compound flood events

2017 and 2019 Ottawa River floods caused extensive property damage, access issues, and stress on critical infrastructure (including the Britannia water purification plant, which has required sandbagging and contingency planning for access and operations). Climate trends favor heavier precipitation and more intense spring freshets. A flood exceeding recent peaks, or one coinciding with urban pluvial flooding like July 1, 2026, could threaten water treatment, transportation, and low-lying neighborhoods. Permanent flood defenses have been discussed for the plants.


### Wildfire smoke, drought-related fires, or a larger conflagration in the Gatineau/Ottawa Valley area

Distant wildfires have already pushed Ottawa’s Air Quality Health Index to extreme levels (2023, 2025). Locally, Gatineau Park and Ottawa Valley areas see periodic high or extreme fire danger, open-fire bans, and occasional small blazes. Dry spells combined with climate factors, pests (e.g., pine beetles), and abundant fuels make a larger, harder-to-control fire possible, with smoke, evacuation, and ecological impacts—even if current risk is often moderate-to-low. The 2022 derecho already showed how wind events can devastate tree cover and create more fuel.


### Water supply contamination or disruption (including nuclear-waste related concerns)

The ongoing Near Surface Disposal Facility (NSDF) project at Chalk River (Deep River area, upstream on the Ottawa River) for low-level radioactive waste has faced legal challenges from Algonquin First Nations, opposition from downstream municipalities (including concerns for Ottawa, Gatineau, and Montreal drinking water), and debate over design, leakage potential, seismic activity, and extreme weather resilience. Official assessments have found limited expected impact with mitigations, but the controversy highlights a low-probability, high-consequence risk to the river that supplies the city. Accidental releases, extreme flooding/erosion interacting with waste sites, or other contamination events remain in the “possible” category. Access or operational issues at Britannia or Lemieux plants during floods add another layer.


### Cascading or compound failures

Recent years show the risk of overlapping stresses: power outages during heat or ice events; multiple extremes in one season (2026’s record-wet summer with the July 1 deluge); infrastructure strain on the 417/Queensway (hazmat or multi-vehicle incidents during weather); or social/service disruptions amplifying natural events. The city’s own climate resiliency work identifies priorities around flooding, heat, severe winds, freezing rain, invasive species/pests, and service continuity, with notes on reduced response capacity during repeated or simultaneous events.


These are grounded in events that have already occurred or are flagged in local climate vulnerability work—not pure speculation. Many are becoming somewhat less “unexpected” as patterns shift, which strengthens the case for proactive practice, community-level mitigation, and imagining worst-case overlaps rather than relying solely on process and asset inventories. Nuclear detonation or exotic scenarios from the piece remain far lower probability but illustrate the same logic of thinking beyond the routine.


MY piece’s core point holds: preparedness means practicing for the outliers and reducing vulnerabilities in advance, not just reacting after a once-in-a-generation storm. The July 1 event and the others above give concrete local examples to build on.

i

Ottawa Risk Probabilities — 2026–2030 Council Term

Illustrative Risk Probabilities for Ottawa
2026–2030 Term of Council

Estimated chance of at least one notable / impactful event during the four-year term. These are rough, qualitative judgments based on recent history, observed trends, and City of Ottawa / NCC climate projections — not formal actuarial or scientific forecasts.

Important: “Notable” means an event with significant local disruption, damage, or public-health impact (comparable to recent reference events such as the July 1 2026 flooding, 2022 derecho, 2018 tornadoes, or major smoke episodes). Probabilities are higher for lower-intensity versions of the same hazards.
Risk Estimated Probability (for 2026–2030) Rationale / Recent Context
Intense short-duration rainfall / urban (pluvial) flooding
(July 1 2026 style)
High
70–85%
2026 already produced a near-record event; climate projections show increased extreme precipitation intensity. Multiple damaging urban floods possible.
Prolonged or intense heat waves
(multi-day, high humidex)
Very High
90%+
Multiple heat events already common. Projections indicate roughly 2–4× as many days >30 °C by the 2030s–2050s. Near-certain each summer.
Significant wildfire smoke impacts
(AQHI ≥7–10+ for multiple days)
High
60–75%
Repeated heavy smoke episodes in 2023 and 2025. Large western and northern fire seasons remain likely under current climate trends.
Major ice storm / prolonged freezing rain Moderate
35–50%
1998 remains the benchmark; 2025 Ontario–Quebec ice storm was costly. More days near 0 °C increase the risk of freezing rain.
Severe convective storms / tornadoes / derecho-type winds Moderate
25–40%
2018 EF3 (Dunrobin–Gatineau), 2022 derecho (estimated 190 km/h gusts, massive outages), plus smaller recent tornadoes. Favourable conditions expected to persist or increase.
Major Ottawa River (riverine) flooding Moderate
25–40%
2017 and 2019 were significant. Heavier spring precipitation and freshets raise the chance of another large event, including potential impacts on water-treatment access.
Cascading infrastructure failures
(power + heat/cold/flood overlap)
Moderate
30–45%
Already observed when storms or ice coincide with extreme temperatures. Higher likelihood as individual extreme-event frequency rises.
Significant civil unrest / large-scale sustained protests Low–Moderate
15–30%
2022 trucker convoy demonstrated the possibility of multi-week disruption. Labour, housing, or political flashpoints remain possible but not the baseline expectation.
Local significant wildfire
(Gatineau Park / Ottawa Valley, requiring evacuations or major response)
Low
10–20%
Periodic high fire danger and small blazes occur; large, hard-to-control local fires remain uncommon but become more plausible in dry periods.
Major water-supply contamination event
(including nuclear-waste-related scenarios at Chalk River)
Very Low
<5%
Ongoing controversy and residual risk around the Near Surface Disposal Facility and historical waste. Designed and regulated to very low probability of significant release affecting Ottawa’s drinking water.
https://peterkarwacki.blogspot.com/p/prepare-by-imagining-unimagineable.html?m=1

#571 A real choice for RideauRockcliffe



My Data-driven leadership versus "Leadership that listens" for Rideau-Rockcliffe. 

Choose Real oversight. Transparent metrics. Resident-first solutions.


Voters have a genuine choice, not an automatic return of the status quo. The differences are documented, with sources, on a single summary page at Differences


Key areas of difference include:

• Infrastructure and transportation: Support for the Eastern Bridge (with specific conditions to protect local neighbourhoods, including truck routing, noise/air standards, grade-separated connections, and transit/active-transportation elements on opening day), versus the incumbent’s opposition; the long-delayed Hemlock Road connection at Wateridge Village; and traffic-calming measures such as a traffic circle or equivalent at St-Laurent/Hemlock (and related Beechwood corridor concerns).

• Parks and recreation: The planned loss of the Bathgate Park basketball court (and associated naturalization) relative to amenities elsewhere in the ward, such as Riverain Park; programming and access questions at Jetform Park; and the future of 815 St-Laurent for soccer and other community use.
• Governance and access: Reducing Ottawa City Council from 24 wards to 12 to improve decision-making and reduce costs, and expanding public Wi-Fi hotspots in parks and community spaces. I will also make the Wateridge Hemlock link a priority.

The new Eastern Bridge in particular is a defining file for the ward and the region; the candidates’ approaches to leverage, conditions, and engagement differ sharply.

As a voter
 (1) note where the Ward 13 candidates differ on the issues; 
(2) ask why community associations failed to organize a debate
(3) Just ask me - I am available at any time to answer questions.

A two-person race with documented policy differences is the minimum condition for residents to exercise a real choice. I hope CBC Ottawa will help provide that information in the remaining days before October 26.

In RideauRockcliffe 60% who can, simply will not vote, and of the 40% who do, barely 10% will have bothered to watch the ward debate between myself and the King.

Here is the link. A 30 minute ask for your civic responsibility!