Campaign Video

Https://youtu.be/zBxbnuPAazE

Saturday, 17 October 2026

#572 How's your Crystal Ball?



Preparedness means practicing for the outliers and reducing vulnerabilities in advance, not just reacting after a once-in-a-generation storm. The July 1 event and others give concrete local examples to build on.


**The July 1, 2026 flooding (up to ~167 mm in a few hours in places like Britannia, city-labeled roughly a 1-in-200-year event in spots, thousands of basement floods, major insured losses concentrated in Nepean/southwest Ottawa as part of a broader Ontario-Quebec thunderstorm event later estimated around $491 million) is a clear real-world example of the “expect the unexpected” theme in my 2023 unpublished.ca piece.** It showed how intense short-duration rainfall can overwhelm drainage, cause widespread property damage, disrupt services, and leave people dealing with insurance gaps, cleanup, and long-term fallout (some apartment residents reported months of issues).


Drawing from recent years of news, official climate assessments (including Ottawa’s Climate Ready work and vulnerability studies), and events that have already hit the National Capital Region or nearby, here are other plausible high-impact scenarios that are possible even if not the most probable in any given year. These align with the piece’s call to imagine and prepare for outliers beyond routine asset-focused planning.


### Extreme convective storms, tornadoes, and derecho-style wind events

Ottawa has already seen these. The 2018 EF3 tornado path from Dunrobin into Gatineau caused major structural damage, power outages, and injuries. The May 2022 derecho brought estimated gusts up to ~190 km/h in parts of the city, widespread tree and infrastructure destruction, power outages affecting hundreds of thousands (Hydro Ottawa described some impacts as worse than the 1998 ice storm or 2018 tornadoes in scale), fatalities regionally, and roughly $1 billion in damages across Ontario and Quebec. Smaller tornadoes have occurred more recently (e.g., Barrhaven area in 2023; EF0 near Kemptville in August 2026). Climate projections and recent patterns support more favorable conditions for severe winds, tornadoes, and long-lived thunderstorm lines. A stronger or more urban-centered event, or a sequence of them, remains possible and could combine with flooding or power loss.


### Ice storms, freezing rain, and severe winter events

The 1998 ice storm remains a regional benchmark for prolonged outages and infrastructure damage. A late-March 2025 ice storm in Ontario and Quebec was one of the costliest events of that year for insurers (~$466 million). Projections note more days near 0°C and potential increases in freezing rain under climate change, with recent warnings (e.g., around El Niño influences) of more freeze-thaw cycles and ice accumulation. Extended outages in extreme cold (or followed by thaw/flooding) stress heating, water systems, and vulnerable populations. Record snowfalls have also disrupted the city in recent years.


### Prolonged or intense heat waves

Ottawa has experienced multi-day heat events with high humidex values (near or at records around 46–47). 2025 already featured multiple heat warnings and a high number of days over 30°C. Official projections point to roughly four times as many very hot days by the 2050s under higher-emission scenarios, plus more humidity. Impacts include health system strain (emergency visits, hospitalizations), power demand spikes that risk outages, and amplified effects on seniors, outdoor workers, and those without adequate cooling. Compounding with wildfire smoke or infrastructure issues raises the stakes.


### Major riverine flooding or compound flood events

2017 and 2019 Ottawa River floods caused extensive property damage, access issues, and stress on critical infrastructure (including the Britannia water purification plant, which has required sandbagging and contingency planning for access and operations). Climate trends favor heavier precipitation and more intense spring freshets. A flood exceeding recent peaks, or one coinciding with urban pluvial flooding like July 1, 2026, could threaten water treatment, transportation, and low-lying neighborhoods. Permanent flood defenses have been discussed for the plants.


### Wildfire smoke, drought-related fires, or a larger conflagration in the Gatineau/Ottawa Valley area

Distant wildfires have already pushed Ottawa’s Air Quality Health Index to extreme levels (2023, 2025). Locally, Gatineau Park and Ottawa Valley areas see periodic high or extreme fire danger, open-fire bans, and occasional small blazes. Dry spells combined with climate factors, pests (e.g., pine beetles), and abundant fuels make a larger, harder-to-control fire possible, with smoke, evacuation, and ecological impacts—even if current risk is often moderate-to-low. The 2022 derecho already showed how wind events can devastate tree cover and create more fuel.


### Water supply contamination or disruption (including nuclear-waste related concerns)

The ongoing Near Surface Disposal Facility (NSDF) project at Chalk River (Deep River area, upstream on the Ottawa River) for low-level radioactive waste has faced legal challenges from Algonquin First Nations, opposition from downstream municipalities (including concerns for Ottawa, Gatineau, and Montreal drinking water), and debate over design, leakage potential, seismic activity, and extreme weather resilience. Official assessments have found limited expected impact with mitigations, but the controversy highlights a low-probability, high-consequence risk to the river that supplies the city. Accidental releases, extreme flooding/erosion interacting with waste sites, or other contamination events remain in the “possible” category. Access or operational issues at Britannia or Lemieux plants during floods add another layer.


### Cascading or compound failures

Recent years show the risk of overlapping stresses: power outages during heat or ice events; multiple extremes in one season (2026’s record-wet summer with the July 1 deluge); infrastructure strain on the 417/Queensway (hazmat or multi-vehicle incidents during weather); or social/service disruptions amplifying natural events. The city’s own climate resiliency work identifies priorities around flooding, heat, severe winds, freezing rain, invasive species/pests, and service continuity, with notes on reduced response capacity during repeated or simultaneous events.


These are grounded in events that have already occurred or are flagged in local climate vulnerability work—not pure speculation. Many are becoming somewhat less “unexpected” as patterns shift, which strengthens the case for proactive practice, community-level mitigation, and imagining worst-case overlaps rather than relying solely on process and asset inventories. Nuclear detonation or exotic scenarios from the piece remain far lower probability but illustrate the same logic of thinking beyond the routine.


MY piece’s core point holds: preparedness means practicing for the outliers and reducing vulnerabilities in advance, not just reacting after a once-in-a-generation storm. The July 1 event and the others above give concrete local examples to build on.

i

Ottawa Risk Probabilities — 2026–2030 Council Term

Illustrative Risk Probabilities for Ottawa
2026–2030 Term of Council

Estimated chance of at least one notable / impactful event during the four-year term. These are rough, qualitative judgments based on recent history, observed trends, and City of Ottawa / NCC climate projections — not formal actuarial or scientific forecasts.

Important: “Notable” means an event with significant local disruption, damage, or public-health impact (comparable to recent reference events such as the July 1 2026 flooding, 2022 derecho, 2018 tornadoes, or major smoke episodes). Probabilities are higher for lower-intensity versions of the same hazards.
Risk Estimated Probability (for 2026–2030) Rationale / Recent Context
Intense short-duration rainfall / urban (pluvial) flooding
(July 1 2026 style)
High
70–85%
2026 already produced a near-record event; climate projections show increased extreme precipitation intensity. Multiple damaging urban floods possible.
Prolonged or intense heat waves
(multi-day, high humidex)
Very High
90%+
Multiple heat events already common. Projections indicate roughly 2–4× as many days >30 °C by the 2030s–2050s. Near-certain each summer.
Significant wildfire smoke impacts
(AQHI ≥7–10+ for multiple days)
High
60–75%
Repeated heavy smoke episodes in 2023 and 2025. Large western and northern fire seasons remain likely under current climate trends.
Major ice storm / prolonged freezing rain Moderate
35–50%
1998 remains the benchmark; 2025 Ontario–Quebec ice storm was costly. More days near 0 °C increase the risk of freezing rain.
Severe convective storms / tornadoes / derecho-type winds Moderate
25–40%
2018 EF3 (Dunrobin–Gatineau), 2022 derecho (estimated 190 km/h gusts, massive outages), plus smaller recent tornadoes. Favourable conditions expected to persist or increase.
Major Ottawa River (riverine) flooding Moderate
25–40%
2017 and 2019 were significant. Heavier spring precipitation and freshets raise the chance of another large event, including potential impacts on water-treatment access.
Cascading infrastructure failures
(power + heat/cold/flood overlap)
Moderate
30–45%
Already observed when storms or ice coincide with extreme temperatures. Higher likelihood as individual extreme-event frequency rises.
Significant civil unrest / large-scale sustained protests Low–Moderate
15–30%
2022 trucker convoy demonstrated the possibility of multi-week disruption. Labour, housing, or political flashpoints remain possible but not the baseline expectation.
Local significant wildfire
(Gatineau Park / Ottawa Valley, requiring evacuations or major response)
Low
10–20%
Periodic high fire danger and small blazes occur; large, hard-to-control local fires remain uncommon but become more plausible in dry periods.
Major water-supply contamination event
(including nuclear-waste-related scenarios at Chalk River)
Very Low
<5%
Ongoing controversy and residual risk around the Near Surface Disposal Facility and historical waste. Designed and regulated to very low probability of significant release affecting Ottawa’s drinking water.

#571 A real choice for RideauRockcliffe



My Data-driven leadership versus "Leadership that listens" for Rideau-Rockcliffe. 

Choose Real oversight. Transparent metrics. Resident-first solutions.


Voters have a genuine choice, not an automatic return of the status quo. The differences are documented, with sources, on a single summary page at Differences


Key areas of difference include:

• Infrastructure and transportation: Support for the Eastern Bridge (with specific conditions to protect local neighbourhoods, including truck routing, noise/air standards, grade-separated connections, and transit/active-transportation elements on opening day), versus the incumbent’s opposition; the long-delayed Hemlock Road connection at Wateridge Village; and traffic-calming measures such as a traffic circle or equivalent at St-Laurent/Hemlock (and related Beechwood corridor concerns).

• Parks and recreation: The planned loss of the Bathgate Park basketball court (and associated naturalization) relative to amenities elsewhere in the ward, such as Riverain Park; programming and access questions at Jetform Park; and the future of 815 St-Laurent for soccer and other community use.
• Governance and access: Reducing Ottawa City Council from 24 wards to 12 to improve decision-making and reduce costs, and expanding public Wi-Fi hotspots in parks and community spaces. I will also make the Wateridge Hemlock link a priority.

The new Eastern Bridge in particular is a defining file for the ward and the region; the candidates’ approaches to leverage, conditions, and engagement differ sharply.

As a voter
 (1) note where the Ward 13 candidates differ on the issues; 
(2) ask why community associations failed to organize a debate
(3) Just ask me - I am available at any time to answer questions.

A two-person race with documented policy differences is the minimum condition for residents to exercise a real choice. I hope CBC Ottawa will help provide that information in the remaining days before October 26.

In RideauRockcliffe 60% who can, simply will not vote, and of the 40% who do, barely 10% will have bothered to watch the ward debate between myself and the King.

Here is the link. A 30 minute ask for your civic responsibility!


Friday, 16 October 2026

#570 Ward Debate Views in Rideau Rockcliffe and across the city

In Ward 13? Up 50% since 2022


Rogers TV ward debates: how each view count was built (to 20261016)

Each bar is a ward's total YouTube views on Oct. 16, 2026, split by when the views arrived. Gray is the first reading; the colours are views added in each later period. Wards are sorted by total. Ward 13 (Rideau-Rockcliffe) is highlighted.

First reading to 9/13 to 9/14–15 to 9/18 to 9/24 to 10/3 to 10/9 to 10/16 6 Stittsville Ward 6: first reading +2,831 (total 2,831) Ward 6: to 9/13 +300 (total 3,131) Ward 6: to 9/18 +1,257 (total 4,388) Ward 6: to 9/24 +743 (total 5,131) Ward 6: to 10/3 +680 (total 5,811) Ward 6: to 10/9 +277 (total 6,088) Ward 6: to 10/16 +294 (total 6,382) 6,382 1 Orléans East-Cumberland Ward 1: first reading +2,588 (total 2,588) Ward 1: to 9/13 +400 (total 2,988) Ward 1: to 9/14–15 +353 (total 3,341) Ward 1: to 9/18 +890 (total 4,231) Ward 1: to 9/24 +627 (total 4,858) Ward 1: to 10/3 +707 (total 5,565) Ward 1: to 10/9 +317 (total 5,882) Ward 1: to 10/16 +391 (total 6,273) 6,273 14 Somerset Ward 14: first reading +426 (total 426) Ward 14: to 9/13 +294 (total 720) Ward 14: to 9/18 +685 (total 1,405) Ward 14: to 9/24 +453 (total 1,858) Ward 14: to 10/3 +483 (total 2,341) Ward 14: to 10/9 +126 (total 2,467) Ward 14: to 10/16 +233 (total 2,700) 2,700 15 Kitchissippi Ward 15: first reading +338 (total 338) Ward 15: to 9/13 +193 (total 531) Ward 15: to 9/18 +610 (total 1,141) Ward 15: to 9/24 +277 (total 1,418) Ward 15: to 10/3 +476 (total 1,894) Ward 15: to 10/9 +131 (total 2,025) Ward 15: to 10/16 +309 (total 2,334) 2,334 12 Rideau-Vanier Ward 12: first reading +674 (total 674) Ward 12: to 9/13 +199 (total 873) Ward 12: to 9/18 +605 (total 1,478) Ward 12: to 9/24 +237 (total 1,715) Ward 12: to 10/3 +283 (total 1,998) Ward 12: to 10/9 +119 (total 2,117) Ward 12: to 10/16 +130 (total 2,247) 2,247 2 Orléans West-Innes Ward 2: first reading +1,078 (total 1,078) Ward 2: to 9/13 +125 (total 1,203) Ward 2: to 9/18 +348 (total 1,551) Ward 2: to 9/24 +138 (total 1,689) Ward 2: to 10/3 +186 (total 1,875) Ward 2: to 10/9 +101 (total 1,976) Ward 2: to 10/16 +115 (total 2,091) 2,091 9 Knoxdale-Merivale Ward 9: first reading +743 (total 743) Ward 9: to 9/13 +147 (total 890) Ward 9: to 9/18 +383 (total 1,273) Ward 9: to 9/24 +251 (total 1,524) Ward 9: to 10/3 +189 (total 1,713) Ward 9: to 10/9 +72 (total 1,785) Ward 9: to 10/16 +140 (total 1,925) 1,925 4 Kanata North Ward 4: first reading +830 (total 830) Ward 4: to 9/13 +168 (total 998) Ward 4: to 9/18 +329 (total 1,327) Ward 4: to 9/24 +124 (total 1,451) Ward 4: to 10/3 +187 (total 1,638) Ward 4: to 10/9 +83 (total 1,721) Ward 4: to 10/16 +96 (total 1,817) 1,817 3 Barrhaven West Ward 3: first reading +358 (total 358) Ward 3: to 9/13 +89 (total 447) Ward 3: to 9/18 +341 (total 788) Ward 3: to 9/24 +237 (total 1,025) Ward 3: to 10/3 +271 (total 1,296) Ward 3: to 10/9 +141 (total 1,437) Ward 3: to 10/16 +115 (total 1,552) 1,552 5 West Carleton-March Ward 5: first reading +474 (total 474) Ward 5: to 9/13 +105 (total 579) Ward 5: to 9/18 +249 (total 828) Ward 5: to 9/24 +145 (total 973) Ward 5: to 10/3 +159 (total 1,132) Ward 5: to 10/9 +135 (total 1,267) Ward 5: to 10/16 +124 (total 1,391) 1,391 11 Beacon Hill-Cyrville Ward 11: first reading +147 (total 147) Ward 11: to 9/13 +226 (total 373) Ward 11: to 9/18 +418 (total 791) Ward 11: to 9/24 +120 (total 911) Ward 11: to 10/3 +156 (total 1,067) Ward 11: to 10/9 +80 (total 1,147) Ward 11: to 10/16 +91 (total 1,238) 1,238 18 Alta Vista Ward 18: first reading +78 (total 78) Ward 18: to 9/18 +659 (total 737) Ward 18: to 9/24 +180 (total 917) Ward 18: to 10/3 +191 (total 1,108) Ward 18: to 10/9 +43 (total 1,151) Ward 18: to 10/16 +72 (total 1,223) 1,223 19 Orléans South-Navan Ward 19: first reading +28 (total 28) Ward 19: to 9/18 +744 (total 772) Ward 19: to 9/24 +146 (total 918) Ward 19: to 10/3 +175 (total 1,093) Ward 19: to 10/9 +59 (total 1,152) Ward 19: to 10/16 +60 (total 1,212) 1,212 13 Rideau-Rockcliffe Ward 13: first reading +238 (total 238) Ward 13: to 9/13 +87 (total 325) Ward 13: to 9/14–15 +127 (total 452) Ward 13: to 9/18 +181 (total 633) Ward 13: to 9/24 +143 (total 776) Ward 13: to 10/3 +159 (total 935) Ward 13: to 10/9 +98 (total 1,033) Ward 13: to 10/16 +153 (total 1,186) 1,186 24 Barrhaven East Ward 24: first reading +51 (total 51) Ward 24: to 9/18 +601 (total 652) Ward 24: to 9/24 +94 (total 746) Ward 24: to 10/3 +234 (total 980) Ward 24: to 10/9 +58 (total 1,038) Ward 24: to 10/16 +78 (total 1,116) 1,116 8 College Ward 8: first reading +479 (total 479) Ward 8: to 9/13 +59 (total 538) Ward 8: to 9/18 +161 (total 699) Ward 8: to 9/24 +95 (total 794) Ward 8: to 10/3 +100 (total 894) Ward 8: to 10/9 +59 (total 953) Ward 8: to 10/16 +61 (total 1,014) 1,014 17 Capital Ward 17: first reading +130 (total 130) Ward 17: to 9/13 +162 (total 292) Ward 17: to 9/18 +286 (total 578) Ward 17: to 9/24 +130 (total 708) Ward 17: to 10/3 +105 (total 813) Ward 17: to 10/9 +44 (total 857) Ward 17: to 10/16 +76 (total 933) 933 23 Kanata South Ward 23: first reading +481 (total 481) Ward 23: to 9/18 +52 (total 533) Ward 23: to 9/24 +54 (total 587) Ward 23: to 10/3 +172 (total 759) Ward 23: to 10/9 +42 (total 801) Ward 23: to 10/16 +86 (total 887) 887 7 Bay Ward 7: first reading +451 (total 451) Ward 7: to 9/13 +30 (total 481) Ward 7: to 9/18 +135 (total 616) Ward 7: to 9/24 +52 (total 668) Ward 7: to 10/3 +74 (total 742) Ward 7: to 10/9 +46 (total 788) Ward 7: to 10/16 +83 (total 871) 871 10 Gloucester-Southgate Ward 10: first reading +314 (total 314) Ward 10: to 9/13 +26 (total 340) Ward 10: to 9/18 +123 (total 463) Ward 10: to 9/24 +48 (total 511) Ward 10: to 10/3 +83 (total 594) Ward 10: to 10/9 +56 (total 650) Ward 10: to 10/16 +26 (total 676) 676 22 Riverside South-Findlay C… Ward 22: first reading +8 (total 8) Ward 22: to 9/18 +355 (total 363) Ward 22: to 9/24 +48 (total 411) Ward 22: to 10/3 +63 (total 474) Ward 22: to 10/9 +14 (total 488) Ward 22: to 10/16 +31 (total 519) 519 20 Osgoode Ward 20: first reading +28 (total 28) Ward 20: to 9/18 +182 (total 210) Ward 20: to 9/24 +83 (total 293) Ward 20: to 10/3 +119 (total 412) Ward 20: to 10/9 +27 (total 439) Ward 20: to 10/16 +45 (total 484) 484

Wards 16 and 21 were acclaimed and have no debate. Wards 18–24 were first checked 9/14–15, so their gray segment is small. Periods are uneven in length (1 day to 2 weeks), so compare colours within a ward cautiously. Views are totals, not unique viewers. Source: Rogers TV debate videos on YouTube; counts recorded by Peter Karwacki.

Ottawa 2026 municipal election: all 24 wards (current to 20261016)

Candidate platforms plus Rogers TV debate links and YouTube view counts. Voting day is Monday, Oct. 26, 2026. Platforms are short public summaries from campaign sites and news questionnaires (CTV, CBC, Ottawa Citizen), not endorsements. Wards 16 and 21 are acclaimed, so there is no contested debate. View counts below were last checked Friday, Oct. 16, 2026.

WardCandidatePlatform (short)Rogers TV debateViews 10/16
1 Orléans East-CumberlandMatt Luloff (inc.)Finish east LRT links; cut Innes / Hwy 174 congestion; keep fares down; fund roads inside the existing budget, not a new levy.Watch6,273
Barbara Daniela GandolfoRestore lost bus service (95-style route); traffic calming; bilingual childcare; stormwater, trees, heat-resistant streets; east-end “fair share.”
Sherif RizkAccessible city services; anticipate problems instead of reacting; bilingual administration.
Bob BellInfrastructure transparency; questioned capital cuts; business-friendly process.
Tammie TrellertAccountability and service delivery; limited published policy paper.
Mazhar ChoudhryTech-enabled services; protect local heritage during growth.
Yvette AshiriCommunity-centred voice; inclusion; growth that includes families and newcomers.
2 Orléans West-InnesLaura Dudas (inc.)Continue current representation; east-end roads, services and community facilities.Watch2,091
Jenna JessopClearer City Hall communication; stakeholder engagement from a public-service background.
David PurchaseService-oriented challenge; limited published platform.
3 Barrhaven WestDavid Hill (inc.)Finish first-term files; suburban growth, roads and community infrastructure.Watch1,552
Donna BlackburnSocial services, housing supports, school-community links from 16 years as an OCDSB trustee.
Jeff BalysIndependent business lens; “fresh perspective” rather than a long policy paper.
4 Kanata NorthCathy Curry (inc.)Continuity on Kanata North growth, the tech park and local services.Watch1,817
Rob Millan“Build smart. Spend smart.” Lock in Stage 3 LRT; better west-end buses and March Road rapid transit; grow the tech park with housing and amenities; keep taxes in check.
James MurchisonChange in representation; thinner published platform than Millan.
5 West Carleton-MarchClarke Kelly (inc.)Rural roads, village services and a rural voice at council.Watch1,391
Christine HarrisonCommunity well-being and practical rural service.
Dylan NoseRural accountability; limited additional published detail.
6 Stittsville (open seat)Marie-Ange Yindaki AhinfulGrow Stittsville responsibly; keep community character; women, youth and family services.Watch6,382
Tanya HeinResident advocacy; second run after 2022.
Kevin HuaResident service under growth pressure.
Paul MeekLocal business and employment lens on growth.
Sheetal NarwalCommunity safety and responsible growth.
Devin Michael Fitzgerald O’BrienLimited published platform.
Mani SharmaBalance growth with village / rural identity.
Theresa QadriLocal business and village character.
Chelsea WaltonCity employee; operations knowledge and growth management.
7 BayTheresa Kavanagh (inc.)Inflation-capped taxes worsened the infrastructure deficit; open to higher taxes if needed for stormwater.Watch871
Spencer RadfordAging stormwater needs upgrades; would support a “reasonable” tax increase, but not load every cost onto property tax.
Butch MooreNo tax hike or stormwater levy. Cut other spending first.
8 CollegeLaine Johnson (inc.)Stormwater capacity for climate extremes; better transit; road safety; keep pools and community centres maintained.Watch1,014
Abakar MalloumDid not answer the CTV questionnaire; no detailed public platform located.
9 Knoxdale-MerivaleSean Devine (inc.)Finish first-term files; infrastructure and neighbourhood planning on a high-traffic west-end corridor.Watch1,925
Cole Fraser JonesInfrastructure first; accountability to residents “not to a party.”
Anna Ielo-TalCommunity-building and resident engagement.
Brandon LyLimited published municipal platform beyond biography.
10 Gloucester-SouthgateJessica Bradley (inc.)Continuity; 14 years of community and political work in the ward.Watch676
Donna DicksonYouth safety and community supports from a former trustee and youth-nonprofit founder.
John RedinsAccessible transit and disability inclusion.
Ayub OmarLimited published platform.
Ahmed RashidLimited published platform.
11 Beacon Hill-CyrvilleTim Tierney (inc.)Continuity; opposed an infrastructure levy in council debate; local roads and services.Watch1,238
Cathryne MilburnResident service from former city staff and a former OCDSB trustee.
Coreen CorcoranSmaller-government / civil-liberties frame; limited municipal policy paper.
12 Rideau-VanierStéphanie Plante (inc.)Safety, housing and bilingual downtown services in ByWard Market, Lowertown, Sandy Hill and Vanier.Watch2,247
Lyra EvansHousing, inclusion and downtown livability from two terms as an OCDSB trustee.
Julie Fiala ChartrandLimited published platform.
Brian PaquetteLimited published platform.
Michael Karl SewanakuLimited published platform.
Eric SmithLimited published platform.
13 Rideau-RockcliffeRawlson King (inc.)Housing, equity and ward services; seek a third term on that record.Watch1,186
Peter J. KarwackiLead on the next interprovincial bridge rather than “sit on the sidelines”; project-management lens.
14 SomersetAriel Troster (inc.)Affordable housing, funded social services, safer walking / cycling / transit; “leave no one behind.”Watch2,700
Robert DekkerCentretown livability; community-association critique of current council direction.
Dillon AndersonFirst-time council bid; limited standalone municipal paper.
Michael TayNewcomer settlement, youth and downtown services.
Nicholas GolléLimited published platform beyond biography.
15 Kitchissippi (open seat)Joanne ChianelloCity Hall literacy; housing and urban-ward service expected to be central.Watch2,334
Brian InnesNeighbourhood-association record; housing and main-street balance.
Subhir UppalSmall-business and housing-approval lens.
Xavier CommerfordLimited published platform.
16 RiverRiley Brockington (acclaimed)Reliable buses; road and sidewalk renewal; protect the McCarthy corridor; finish Alexander Community Centre; open River’s first library. A levy “will need to be debated.”No debate (acclaimed)—
17 CapitalShawn Menard (inc.)Housing, climate and intensification with consultation; opposed treating an infrastructure levy as a “bogeyman.”Watch933
Farah Gulzar“Leadership that delivers, not just promises”; families, seniors, youth and disability access.
Jaac DoduckYouth engagement and neighbourhood services from the Glebe Community Centre.
18 Alta VistaMarty Carr (inc.)Continue first-term service around hospitals, schools and established neighbourhoods.Watch1,223
Tressy El-HawiStronger community centres; bilingual recreation for families, seniors and newcomers.
Muhyadin Omar BarkhatSupports an infrastructure levy; seniors programming and more PSWs; more affordable housing.
Derek McSweeneyPublic-service delivery focus; less published detail than others.
Elsa NiyongaboLimited published platform beyond biography.
19 Orléans South-NavanCatherine Kitts (inc.)Affordability, community safety and access to services in a suburban-plus-rural ward.Watch1,212
Jason WingSmall-business / affordability pitch; not a career politician.
20 OsgoodeIsabelle Skalski (inc.)Modernize operations, cut red tape; rural roads and village services.Watch484
Bruce Anthony FaulknerNo CTV questionnaire on file; limited public platform.
21 Rideau-JockDavid Brown (acclaimed)No 2026 comparative platform. Record is rural roads, agriculture and village services.No debate (acclaimed)—
22 Riverside South-Findlay CreekSteve Desroches (inc.)Experience managing fast-growing south-end communities; infrastructure catching growth.Watch519
Muyiwa OjoFinancial-accountability challenge; detailed public platform still thin.
23 Kanata SouthAllan Hubley (inc.)Continuity on west-end roads, recreation and the Kanata South business park.Watch887
Erin CoffinResident-first challenge after finishing second in 2022; Bridlewood Community Association president.
Sam BhalesarPolitical-organizing experience applied to ward service.
Megan Strazds-EsenbergsPolicy-analyst challenge; limited standalone campaign paper.
24 Barrhaven EastWilson Lo (inc.)Transit-knowledge incumbent; south Barrhaven growth and local service.Watch1,116
Zahy A AdamAccountable leadership on growth and services.
Ahmed AlsabaawiAffordability and property tax; youth community centres; community safety.
Yoosaf MelparambaHousing-market / growth lens; thinner published municipal platform.
Jules RuhindaLimited published platform in available questionnaires.

Rogers TV hub: youtube.com/@ROGERStvofficial · Official list: ottawa.ca, who is running in my ward. Bars are scaled to the highest ward. Views are YouTube totals for each ward debate, not unique viewers. This page is a voter aid, not an endorsement.

Debate views over time

Ward9/129/139/14–159/189/2410/310/910/16Growth
1 Orléans East-Cumberland2,5882,9883,3414,2314,8585,5655,8826,273×2.4
2 Orléans West-Innes1,0781,203—1,5511,6891,8751,9762,091×1.9
3 Barrhaven West358447—7881,0251,2961,4371,552×4.3
4 Kanata North830998—1,3271,4511,6381,7211,817×2.2
5 West Carleton-March474579—8289731,1321,2671,391×2.9
6 Stittsville2,8313,131—4,3885,1315,8116,0886,382×2.3
7 Bay451481—616668742788871×1.9
8 College479538—6997948949531,014×2.1
9 Knoxdale-Merivale743890—1,2731,5241,7131,7851,925×2.6
10 Gloucester-Southgate314340—463511594650676×2.2
11 Beacon Hill-Cyrville147373—7919111,0671,1471,238×8.4
12 Rideau-Vanier674873—1,4781,7151,9982,1172,247×3.3
13 Rideau-Rockcliffe2383254526337769351,0331,186×5.0
14 Somerset426720—1,4051,8582,3412,4672,700×6.3
15 Kitchissippi338531—1,1411,4181,8942,0252,334×6.9
17 Capital130292—578708813857933×7.2
18 Alta Vista——787379171,1081,1511,223×15.7
19 Orléans South-Navan——287729181,0931,1521,212×43.3
20 Osgoode——28210293412439484×17.3
22 Riverside South-Findlay Creek——8363411474488519×64.9
23 Kanata South——481533587759801887×1.8
24 Barrhaven East——516527469801,0381,116×21.9

Growth is the 10/16 count divided by the first reading. Wards 18–24 were first checked 9/14–15, so their growth multiples are not comparable with wards checked 9/12. Ward 4 on 9/18 was recorded as “>1327”.

#569 No..You Cannot See Everything!

#569 You Can’t See Everything: The Irony of Rideau-Rockcliffe, City Hall and Oversight

A new documentary about Elizabeth Holmes, You Can See Everything, explores corporate deceit and the struggle to manage public perception under scrutiny. In Rideau-Rockcliffe (Ward 13), the dynamic is inverted: the defining feature is not transparency, but massive institutional blind spots including local media, designed to obscure local realities.

Physical and Institutional Obstacles

From the private hedges and security protocols of Rockcliffe Park to City Hall's policy priorities, the landscape often conceals structural issues from public view. Key areas of concern include the Eastern Bridge—where ignoring regional transportation keeps heavy trucks on King Edward—and the financial risks surrounding Lansdowne 2.0. Additionally, local projects like the Bathgate Park basketball court's planned removal and pedestrian infrastructure debates highlight a disconnect in neighborhood planning.

Engagement and Democracy

Low voter turnout and minimal engagement allow the status quo to persist. However, rising views on local debates and increased readership suggest growing community interest in examining municipal records beyond official narratives. Residents are encouraged to review candidate platforms and participate actively in the electoral process.

Posted by Peter Karwacki

You Can’t See Everything: Breaking Through the Rideau-Rockcliffe Blind Spots

There is a lot of buzz right now about the new Elizabeth Holmes film, You Can See Everything. Everyone is talking about total surveillance, exposure, and public scrutiny. But here in Rideau-Rockcliffe (Ward 13), our reality is the exact opposite.

The real irony of our ward is that you cannot see everything.

While official City Hall narratives paint a picture of balanced progress, the truth is obscured behind massive institutional, media, and physical blind spots. If you rely only on glossy campaign pamphlets and name recognition, you miss the structural challenges facing our communities every single day.

What is Being Kept Out of Sight?

  • The Infrastructure Gaps: We see pristine suburban expansions, but we miss the looming $10.8 billion city-wide infrastructure deficit that threatens basic services like our storm sewers and local sidewalks right here in Manor Park.
  • The Transit Disconnect: While decision-makers focus on mega-projects, 52% of east-end residents rank reliable, everyday bus and LRT service as the number one priority in need of rescue.
  • The Local Planning Decisions: Decisions like the planned removal of the Bathgate Park basketball court or the refusal to build an Eastern Bridge to pull heavy trucks off downtown streets happen quietly, away from the public gaze, until it is too late.

Civic Blindness by Choice

The status quo depends entirely on you staying in the dark. When 60% of our neighbors choose not to vote, and only a tiny fraction watch the actual ward debates, the institutional blind spots win.

This election is your chance to change the lens. You don't need to see a Hollywood documentary to know that Rideau-Rockcliffe needs transparency, accountability, and a councillor who will bring these hidden issues directly into the light.

Don't let them keep you in the dark. Look at the record, watch the ward debate, and make your voice count on October 26.

Posted by Peter Karwacki


Taking the intense, claustrophobic premise of You Can See Everything—where cameras pry into the deepest corners of a highly scrutinized life—and flipping it on its head for Rideau-Rockcliffe (Ward 13) is not a big leap.

You Can’t See Everything, a profound irony: despite being home to some of the country’s most powerful institutions, highest-profile residents, and heavily secured properties, the ward contains massive blind spots. It is a landscape defined by extreme socio-economic divides, literal visual barriers, and hidden community struggles.

A Fielder-Oppenheim meta-documentary could explore:

1. The Literal and Figurative Walls of Rockcliffe Park
• The Irony:Rockcliffe Park is home to ambassadors, CEOs, and the Prime Minister’s official residence at 24 Sussex Drive. It is arguably one of the most surveilled, secure neighborhoods in Canada. Yet, the physical environment is deliberately designed so you cannot see.

• Massive privacy hedges, winding roads without sidewalks, and hidden driveways obscure the lives of the elite.
• The Fielder Approach:  Trying to navigate the neighborhood entirely from the sidewalk-less streets, interviewing private security guards or tracking the automated "Smile, You're on Camera" signs, highlighting how the public is watched while the private remains completely unseen.
2. The Socio-Economic Blind Spot (The Overbrook Divide)
• The Irony: Just a short distance south of the affluent estates lies Overbrook, a neighborhood with deep working-class roots, community housing complexes, and grass-roots resilience.
• The Cinematic Contrast: While the city's gaze focuses on the heritage prestige of the northern half of the ward, the daily realities, systemic underinvestments, and community triumphs of Overbrook remain invisible to the average tourist or policymaker.
• Frame the physical boundary lines—like the stark transition across Beechwood Avenue or the Montreal Road corridor—showing how two completely different worlds exist in each other's peripheral vision.
3. The Aviation Parkway and Vacant Spaces
• The Irony: The Aviation Parkway cuts a massive, scenic swath through the ward, designed for pristine, manicured views. Yet, right beside it sits the former CFB Rockcliffe lands and areas of rapid redevelopment.

• The Meta-Narrative:  focus on the physical gaps—empty fields, construction fencing, and bureaucratic dead-zones. You could interview long-time residents about what used to be there versus the gentrification they see happening now, framing the rapid changes as a disappearing act where local history is actively being erased from view.
Visual and Narrative Tone
To capture that distinct psychological thriller energy, lean into:
• The Hyper-Close Surveillance Aesthetic: Long, unblinking zooms on security cameras outside embassies, contrasted immediately with tight, handheld footage of community organizers at the Rideau-Rockcliffe Community Resource Centre.
• The Synth-Drone Contrast: A low, unsettling drone playing over seemingly mundane, beautiful shots of the Rideau River or the Rockcliffe Pavilion, hinting at the underlying tension of municipal politics, housing crises, and gentrification. i




Bridging the Gap


On Retourne à Parc de Rockcliffe

Sometimes (usually) the dogs show more interest in me than the owner!


That's the way it goes in RideauRockcliffe where 60% who can, simply will not vote, and of the 40% who do, barely 10% will have bothered to watch the ward debate between myself and the King.

Here is the link. A 30 minute ask for your civic responsibility!
How things go so wrong: Bre-X, Theranos and the case for oversight

How things can go so wrong: Bre-X, Theranos and the case for oversight at city hall

Neither collapse was a failure of information. The truth was available the whole time, to anyone allowed to take their own samples. What was missing was someone independent, with access and authority, whose job was to check.

oversight roles

Bre-X Minerals (Canada, 1990s)

A Calgary-based junior miner announced an enormous gold deposit at Busang, in Indonesia, and billions in market value followed. A would-be partner’s due diligence, then an independent review in 1997, found the core samples had been tampered with and the gold wasn’t there.

Theranos (United States, 2003–2018)

A startup claimed its device could run a wide range of blood tests from a finger-prick. Whistleblowers and investigative reporting, followed by regulator inspections, showed the technology didn’t perform as claimed. Founder Elizabeth Holmes was convicted of fraud in 2022.

How it unravels

  1. A good story gets a head startBig claim, credible-sounding people, no reason yet to doubt it.
  2. Trust replaces verificationEach overseer assumes another one checked.
  3. Reports replace evidenceOverseers read summaries made by the people they oversee, not raw data.
  4. Doubts are handled insideQuestions are answered with reassurance, or the questioner is sidelined.
  5. An outsider takes their own sampleSomeone with independence and access checks, and it falls apart quickly.
Who was supposed to be watchingEach layer of oversight, how it failed in the two cases, the municipal equivalent, and what strong looks like.
Oversight layer Bre-X Theranos City equivalent What strong looks like
The governing bodyBoard or council Relied on management’s reports and the rising share price as proof. A board of prominent figures, few with laboratory or medical backgrounds, deferred to the founder. Council and committeesReceive presentations prepared by staff and vendors, often with limited time and no independent analysis of their own. Challenge with evidenceStanding right to request raw data and to commission its own analysis, with budget to do it.
Independent verificationOutside technical review Early outside reviews leaned on company-handled samples. The check that mattered came from a partner who took its own. The device was never independently validated, and most tests ran on commercial analyzers. Consultant reportsCommissioned, scoped and paid for by the department or project being reviewed. Overseer sets the scopeReviewer reports to the overseer, not the program, and sees the underlying data.
Rules and regulatorsStandards that bind everyone Resource estimates could be publicised without a uniform standard. Reform followed: Canada’s NI 43-101 now requires qualified persons and defined disclosure. Scrutiny came after whistleblowers and reporters raised the alarm, not before it. Auditor general, integrity commissioner, ombudsmanWhere they exist, they are limited by mandate, budget and what they are permitted to examine. Mandate that matches the riskAuthority to examine major projects while they run, not only after they fail.
Reputation as proxyAnalysts, endorsers, references Strong analyst ratings and major institutional investors made the story look settled. Famous backers and partners lent credibility that no one tested. Vendor assurancesConsultant brand, peer-city references and “industry best practice” stand in for evidence on this contract. Evidence for this caseReputation is a reason to look closer, never a reason to skip the check.
Insiders and the pressWhistleblowers, FOI, reporting Early questions were met with new, bigger announcements. Employees who raised concerns faced pressure to stay quiet. Reporting by journalists broke it open. Staff concerns, FOI, local reportingOften the only outside look, and often slow, narrow or discouraged. Protected, answered channelsSafe ways to report, response deadlines, and records that get released.

Independence

The checker doesn’t report to, depend on, or get paid by the thing being checked.

Access

Raw data and the ability to take their own samples, not just the summary.

Mandate and budget

Authority and resources sized to the risk, not to what is convenient.

Follow-through

Findings get a public response and a deadline, or they change nothing.

Visibility

Residents can see what was checked, by whom, and what was found.

Why it matters locally

Most gaps in municipal reporting are ordinary dysfunction, not fraud. But the structure that let Bre-X and Theranos run is the same structure that lets a troubled project look healthy: oversight that reads reports, not evidence. The cheapest time to build real oversight is before anyone has reason to doubt.

Case summaries are deliberately brief. The point is the need for oversight