Ward 13 · Rideau-Rockcliffe
Leadership That's Told
At Thursday's debate, my opponent described his approach as "leadership that listens." The bridge file shows what that actually means in practice — and who's doing the talking.
"Leadership that listens" sounds like a virtue until you ask a simple follow-up: listens to whom? A councillor who only ever hears from the residents most likely to show up — and most likely to oppose whatever's new — isn't practising judgment. He's relaying a position that was already decided for him, by whoever knocked loudest.
The Eastern Bridge file is the clearest example we have of which one it actually is.
01The motion that avoided the question
In September, council voted 23–2 on a motion — moved by the Ward 13 incumbent — asking the federal impact assessment agency to extend its public comment deadline on the bridge past election day. Buried in the wording was a careful hedge: the motion, it said, does not constitute final support or opposition to the project itself.
That's not a position. It's a way of staying on the file without ever having to defend one. And it's worth noticing who voted against delay: Councillor Gower, who isn't running again and has nothing left to lose by taking a clear stand, was one of only two votes against kicking the question past October.
The comment-deadline fight is largely symbolic in the first place — this stage of the federal process is only the preliminary screening, not the substantive environmental assessment. A councillor confident in the community's opposition wouldn't need to delay a symbolic deadline. The hedge is the tell.
02The one study, asked to carry everything
My opponent's firm opposition to the bridge rests almost entirely on a 2021 study estimating it would divert around 15% of truck traffic off King Edward Avenue. That's a real number, and it's fair to weigh it. But five years on, with the federal government already committing $221 million to preconstruction work and an active review underway, that single figure hasn't been revisited once in public — not against updated traffic data, not against the mitigation terms Ward 13 could actually be negotiating right now, not against anything.
A position formed once, in response to early pushback, and never updated as the file moves forward isn't leadership. It's a commitment made to whoever was in the room first.
03Who's in that room
This is where "listens" and "told" split apart. The residents most likely to turn out to a community association meeting, most likely to write a councillor, most likely to vote in a low-turnout municipal election — are not a random sample of the ward. They skew toward people who've been here longest, own their homes, and have the most to lose from anything that changes the street in front of them. That's not a criticism of who they are. It's just who shows up.
A councillor whose re-election depends on that turnout has every incentive to adopt their position as his own, permanently, regardless of what the file does next. That's not judgment being exercised. That's an input being relayed.
04The version of "listening" I'd rather run on
I support the bridge. Not because I think opposition is illegitimate — it isn't — but because council will decide this 16–9, urban wards outvoted by suburban ones, regardless of what Ward 13 does. The only real choice we have is whether we spend the next several years shaping design and mitigation terms from the table, or spend them outside the room, opposed to a project that gets built anyway.
That's the difference. Listening to a room and then telling people what they already believe isn't leadership — it's a mirror. Leadership is walking into the room, laying out the trade-off honestly, including the parts people don't want to hear, and making the case for the harder position because it's the one that actually protects the ward's interests when the vote doesn't go our way.
My opponent calls it "leadership that listens." Look at the record on this file, and what it actually describes is leadership that's told — once, early, by whoever showed up first — and never revisited since.
No comments:
Post a Comment