#564 An Imbalanced Approach - Look at the bright shiney object!
In 2022, Mark Sutcliffe asked Ottawa to trust him with a simple idea: a balanced approach. Four years on, the record raises a fair question. Balanced between what and what?
The promises were specific
On election night in 2022, CTV News summarized his platform: cap property taxes at 2 to 2.5 per cent a year for two years, find at least $35 million in savings at City Hall, freeze transit fares for all riders, spend $100 million over four years on roads and cycling, and build 100,000 homes over 10 years.[1] CBC reported that he also claimed he could find $35 to $60 million in savings and cut 200 positions without layoffs, all without reducing services. CBC called that a bold assertion at the time.[2]
| Promise | Verdict | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Keep tax increases low (2–2.5%, first two years) | Kept, by his account. He told CTV in May 2026 that he kept this promise. | CTV News Ottawa |
| Freeze transit fares | Not kept | — |
| Find at least $35 million in savings | kept | — |
| Build 100,000 homes over 10 years | Not kept yet | need six more years, behind pace required— |
| $100 million over four years on roads and cycling | kept | — |
He did keep some, and he is right to say so. But holding a tax line is the easiest promise a mayor can make good on. It asks nothing of him except saying no. The other four are where the work was. The dollar value of Lansdowne and the dump dwarf other promises.
What residents are asking for
A Nanos Research poll for CTV News Ottawa, published October 10, found that 55 per cent of residents rank transit as the city service most in need of improvement. Roads and sidewalks came second at 27 per cent. In the east end, 52 per cent ranked transit first.[4] Nik Nanos said the top solutions include better LRT service and more reliable buses. Residents are not divided on this. They want both, and they want them first.
What the term delivered instead
Two of the biggest decisions of the term were never put to voters in 2022.
Lansdowne 2.0. Affordable housing diverted; new arena too small for the PWHL Charge, who moved to the Canadian Tire Centre.
The landfill purchase. $95 million CRRRC price, the appraised land value.
A balanced mayor weighs transit, housing and basic services against projects like these. On this record, the money and the attention went one way.
A local example of the same imbalance: Manor Park sidewalks
The pattern appeared in this ward as well. During the Manor Park road, water and sewer rebuild, city policy calls for adding sidewalks on local streets at the same time so the opportunity is not lost for 70–90 years. Councillor Rawlson King moved to shorten or remove sections of the planned sidewalks. Mayor Sutcliffe supported the motion, calling it a “difficult decision” while noting arguments for applying rules uniformly and avoiding neighborhood-by-neighborhood exceptions.[6]
Council defeated the motion 16–7. The sidewalks will proceed.
Accessibility advocates and several councillors argued that the opposition prioritized a vocal local preference over pedestrian safety, accessibility for people with disabilities, and long-term infrastructure efficiency. Supporters of the motion cited trees, sequencing, and other priorities. Whatever the merits of the specific streets, the episode is revealing: when basic pedestrian infrastructure was on the table in Rideau-Rockcliffe, the mayor sided with the effort to scale it back rather than with the city’s standing practice of building sidewalks when the street is already open. That is not balance. It is choosing one constituency’s preference over universal accessibility and cost-effective infrastructure delivery.
He had the tools
When Sutcliffe was elected, the province had just granted strong mayor powers to Ottawa and Toronto, including a veto over bylaws that conflict with provincial priorities.[5] Those powers also let the mayor prepare the budget. The gap between promise and result cannot be blamed on a council that outvoted him. He had the authority.
Now, more promises
This campaign, he is again pledging to keep tax increases as low as possible. A promise is only worth what the last one was worth. Before taking the new ones at face value, what happened to the 2022 list?
The question for voters. In 2022, voters were told they were choosing balance. They never got to weigh Lansdowne 2.0 or the landfill purchase. On October 26, they can weigh both, plus what he is promising now, against what he delivered last time—and against local decisions such as siding with the motion to reduce Manor Park sidewalks.
Rideau-Rockcliffe needs a councillor who will ask these questions in public, and who will not pander to get through a meeting. That is the job I am asking you to give me.
Sources
- CTV News Ottawa, “Mark Sutcliffe elected mayor of Ottawa” (2022 campaign promises). Link
- CBC News, “For incoming mayor Mark Sutcliffe, the hard part starts now.” Link
- CTV News Ottawa, “100 days until Ottawa’s municipal election: here’s what you need to know.”
- CTV News Ottawa / Nanos Research, “Ottawa voters overwhelmingly choose transit as top municipal election issue,” October 10, 2026. Link
- Reporting on strong-mayor powers granted to Ottawa (Ontario legislation).
- CBC News, Arthur White-Crummey, “Manor Park sidewalks to go ahead after council vote,” April 8, 2026. (Reports King’s motion, Sutcliffe’s support, 16–7 defeat, accessibility arguments, and long-term rebuild policy.)
Time for a change.

ReplyDeleteWhat about the 100,000 homes
On the 100,000 homes promise specifically:
Mark Sutcliffe’s 2022 platform pledged net growth of 100,000 housing units in Ottawa over 10 years (roughly 10,000 units per year on average). Contemporary coverage (Ottawa Citizen, CBC) confirmed this as a core part of his housing plan, focused on incentives such as fee waivers for projects with affordable units and other streamlining measures.Ottawacitizen
Progress as of 2026
CMHC housing-starts data show:
2024: approximately 7,849 starts
2025: 10,864 starts (up 38% year-over-year)
Early 2026: mixed, with some half-year figures lower year-over-year than 2025
That puts the first four years well below the ~10,000-per-year average needed to hit 100,000 by ~2032. Completions lag starts, as is normal. Independent reporting and home-builders’ associations have noted Ottawa is still short of the 12,000–15,000 annual units many estimates say are required to match population growth and improve affordability. CMHC has also flagged a widening supply gap in Ottawa.CTV News
Sutcliffe’s own 2026 messaging has shifted. He highlights that Ottawa’s starts rose in 2025 while many other Ontario markets fell, credits zoning and Housing Action Plan changes for making construction easier, and now pledges to approve 75,000 homes in a next term plus a separate target of 10,000 more affordable units by 2030. He does not claim the original 100,000 figure is on track.X
How this fits the blog’s “No”
Marking the promise “No” in a 2026 scorecard is a reasonable political judgment given the pace so far and the lack of evidence the city is on a clear trajectory for 100,000. It is not a fully completed failure, because the timeline still has years left and housing outcomes depend heavily on interest rates, provincial policy, federal funding, developer decisions, and market conditions—not only municipal approvals. The city’s tools (zoning, fees, process speed) influence supply but do not directly “build” 100,000 homes.
In short: the original 2022 target is behind schedule on available starts data, the mayor has moved to different numerical targets in the current campaign, and the blog’s simplified “No” is defensible as a critique of progress but not a precise final accounting of a decade-long goal
ReplyDeleteOn the $100 million roads and pathways promise:
In 2022 Sutcliffe pledged an additional $100 million over four years to repair and maintain roads, multi-use pathways, and related infrastructure (including snow clearing). Contemporary CTV coverage confirmed the commitment as part of his transportation platform.CTV News
CBC’s August 2026 review of his first-term promises stated that he kept this commitment (and a separate $100 million boost for road maintenance and snow clearing), along with doubling traffic-calming budgets. The same piece noted more than 55 km of new or upgraded cycling paths, lanes, and tracks since he took office.Cbc
Sutcliffe has also publicly claimed the 2022 commitment was met, citing cumulative road-related funding this term (including a $135 million addition in the 2026 budget) totaling roughly $533 million—about a 50% increase over the prior four years.Facebook
35 million in savings? What the record shows by 2026
ReplyDeleteCBC’s August 2026 review of his first-term promises states that he followed through on launching a spending review and that he claims it produced roughly a quarter-billion dollars ($250 million) in efficiencies. The same piece notes that some of those figures included external windfalls (such as the elimination of the federal carbon tax) rather than purely internal operational cuts, and that he did not keep a related promise to cut recreation fees by 10%.Cbc
Sutcliffe and his office have repeatedly stated that more than $250 million in savings and efficiencies were identified over the term (figures around $252–253 million appear in his 2026 campaign materials).